I begin this blog with the illustrious words of the Associate Iconic Justice Sonya Sotomayor while scolding the Federal Prosecutor for misbehaving legally. She stated that "the prosecutor tapped into a deep and sorry vein of racial prejudice that has run through the history of criminal justice in our nation.” and called the statement from the Federal prosecutor, PERNICIOUS. It should be noted that I marched with nearly four thousand Mexicans to stop their deportation as it would be unfair to them being so loyal to America and so hard working. Associate Iconic Justice Sonya Sotomayor
SONY ROY, PICTURE TAKEN 2013.
I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN.
I WAS NEVER A DISSIDENT I AM NOT A DISSIDENT AND I WILL NEVER BE A DISSIDENT my ALLEGIANCE IS TO THE FLAG THAT I EMBRACED SINCE 1998.
If there exists any animosity between my country of origin and the U.S. I was not even born yet and I have no say in such if such exists,. However I am content with my country and since my naturalization I have never and that with proof, invested one red cent in any foreign soil. This special oath is to dispel the myths and the lies that are circulating. Some are misled and repeat such misleading information and others are doing this intentionally, I will collect every information for a law suit against these ignorant who think I have only one case. I take this special oath lest any body believes a lie, whatever source it came from. I LOVE MY COUNTRY AND I AM BOUND TO PROTECT IT, PROMOTE IT, TO ENSURE THAT PEACE IS MAINTAINED WITHIN WHERE I AM. THIS IS A SPECIAL OATH TAKEN ON DECEMBER 2014. It used to read, Federal case # 3:06cv95 and Sony Roy individually and Sony and Raymonde Roy, as husband and wife. It Now Reads, SONY ROY INDIVIDUALLY.
PRO SE PLAINTIFFS, IN PROPRIA PERSONA IN COURT UNDER
06cv95/EMT/ # 09-234 SC # 12-8623
At the get go, I must state here that the fairness Americans are acquainted with in America is now broken and I do not know why. A) The INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT AND B)THE DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS AND DECREES ONCE ENTERED IN COURTS, PROVE THE MERIT OF THE CASE. TWO FEDERAL JUDGES ARE SAYING THAT IT IS NOT SO IN DEFIANCE TO WHAT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS MAINTAINED BEFORE ITS PEOPLE OVER THE YEARS. I NEED CLARIFICATION as AN AVID LAW STUDENT, FOR THE LAW IN MY VIEW IS BROKEN ACCORDING TO:
AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: "The inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be described as the unwritten power without which the Court is unable to function with justice and good reason. As will be observed below, such powers are enjoyed by the Court by virtue of its very nature as a superior court modelled on the lines of an English superior court. All English superior courts, English colonial superior courts and the superior courts which succeeded them are deemed to posses such inherent jurisdiction save where it has been repealed or otherwise amended by legislation."
to "ensure the general welfare of the public."
In this Article I am dealing with the inherent powers of the civil Courts to do justice. The Courts existed even when there was no written statue on the fundamental principle to do justice and to amicably settle the matter. The Courts exist to even today and it has natural power inherited in it by virtue of its duty to do justice between the parties.
The constitution is interpreted by the government and the people. However, the limits of inherent powers were articulated in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)[1]. This case was a Supreme Court decision limiting the power of the president to seize private property in the absence of either specifically-enumerated authority under Article Two of the United States Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. However, Justice Black's majority decision was qualified by separate concurring opinions of five other members of the Court; this made it difficult to determine the details and limits of the president's power to seize private property in emergencies. Justice Jackson's concurring opinion provided three categories to be considered:
INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT FOR JUSTICE: "Inherent powers consist of all powers reasonably required to enable a court to perform efficiently its judicial functions, to protect its dignity, independence, and integrity, and to make its lawful actions effective." The many contexts in which courts have asserted inherent powers include the authorization of rulemaking by the judicial branch, the governance and discipline of the bar by state courts of last resort, and the sanctioning of attorneys by trial lawyers in the course of managing caseflow. While inherent powers can be constrained by constitutional provisions, state and federal judges likewise have enjoyed greater receptivity from the legal profession to assertions of court authority in caseflow management than have their counterparts in other common law nations."There can be no doubt that a court which is endowed with a particular jurisdiction has powers which are necessary to enable it to act effectively within such jurisdiction. I would regard them as powers which are inherent in its jurisdiction. A court must enjoy such powers in order to enforce its rules of practice and to suppress any abuses of its process and to defeat any attempted thwarting of its process."
I AM CALLING ON THE HIGH POWERS OF ALL AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES that I pursue complete finality of my case with conviction that our Fed Judges are Highly Competent as I stated before under special Oath, and my case was never and is not against the United States Government. However our Fed Judges were caught in the net of "UNFORTUNATE CONFUSION" and misled by a misled county misled by a BAD TIP FROM A SELF-PROCLAIMED FUGITIVE as he stated to me his former employer. I further state that never had it entered my mind to make the Federal Government responsible for what has happened in the South, despite the misconception of some and the pursuit of others to disparage my character and metamorphose me into the one I am not, as though I was of the caliber of the FUGITIVE, as a black man. THAT reminds me of the l=while lady who drowned her children and when questioned, blamed it on a black man that was not even near. My intention in pursuing the United Nations was due to the fact that I am a former Foreign National as a former International Student and as such, promises were made to me both in the UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTIONS AT VIENNA AND GENEVA AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AT HOME as an international student back in 1978 and 1979. I intend for Everybody to be clear about this case FOR NEARLY the past two YEARS I HAVE BEEN EXPECTING AN HONEST PERSON TO STEP UP AND SAY "THE BUCK STOPS HERE, BUT IT WAS NOT FOUND." NOW I LOUDLY CALLED ALL RESPONSIBLE CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS TO VEHEMENTLY LOOK AT THIS CASE AND CONTACT ME FOR RESOLUTIONS. So, Please Dear authorities, CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS, and citizens of America, the time is now to cease walking like little children and to step up like grown men like the great Apostle says When I was a child I spake like a child . . ." but the time is now to refute small things and pursue the vitality of the case by taking complete responsibilities like Republicans do sometimes. We must wake up and say "Enough is enough" and no more of that FUGITIVE leading the way, no more of Walton County unchecked by superiors in high places in Florida continuing a pretext with their deceiving attorney Mr. Harry Chiles, trained to hurt and to harm procedurally coupled with a totally uninsured attorney Ken Goldberg, allowed to practice by the LAW BAR IN FLORIDA with an irresponsible license masquerading and believed by all so called respectable people. I hope no one is insulted by what I say here for e have not scratched the tip of the iceberg yet. For, what I say here is not against our darling Judicial system which I must continue to work with both as a moral citizen of the U.S. and a future LAW STUDENT AND LAWYER. I do not intend to see my Federal Government disparaged by Naysayers and I intend here to set the record straight and I decry any such attempt. Needless to reiterate that I MUST GO TO LAW SCHOOL to assist my Country in fixing the mess I see. My God, after unraveling mysteries and the truth although curled under the rubles of burdens of proof, will not forever be sequestered. At the end of the day, (I PREDICT WITH DIVINE AUTHORITY), the truth will no longer reside on the scaffold but its new address will be "on the throne." "This I believe and teach" and I have been doing it for nearly 35 years in America based on the FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. As we refute the bad tip from a FUGITIVE whom I never intend to see for the rest of my life in court, and from whom I demand an injunction of more than 500 feet anywhere. I am in severe shock after 11 hospitalizations and a clear intent to kill me for telling the truth on American Soil, where I saw my blood pressure rising to a deadly level of about 219/109 or 111, that after the severe warning by a court witness, being my former attending physician (OFFER OF PROOF SECURELY PRESENT AT THE DISTRICT COURT).
AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: "The inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may be described as the unwritten power without which the Court is unable to function with justice and good reason. As will be observed below, such powers are enjoyed by the Court by virtue of its very nature as a superior court modelled on the lines of an English superior court. All English superior courts, English colonial superior courts and the superior courts which succeeded them are deemed to posses such inherent jurisdiction save where it has been repealed or otherwise amended by legislation."
to "ensure the general welfare of the public."
In this Article I am dealing with the inherent powers of the civil Courts to do justice. The Courts existed even when there was no written statue on the fundamental principle to do justice and to amicably settle the matter. The Courts exist to even today and it has natural power inherited in it by virtue of its duty to do justice between the parties.
The constitution is interpreted by the government and the people. However, the limits of inherent powers were articulated in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)[1]. This case was a Supreme Court decision limiting the power of the president to seize private property in the absence of either specifically-enumerated authority under Article Two of the United States Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. However, Justice Black's majority decision was qualified by separate concurring opinions of five other members of the Court; this made it difficult to determine the details and limits of the president's power to seize private property in emergencies. Justice Jackson's concurring opinion provided three categories to be considered:
- Congress authorizes (express or implied)
- Congress disapproves (express or implied)
- Congress does nothing (which can invite judicial consideration of the president's actions)
INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT FOR JUSTICE: "Inherent powers consist of all powers reasonably required to enable a court to perform efficiently its judicial functions, to protect its dignity, independence, and integrity, and to make its lawful actions effective." The many contexts in which courts have asserted inherent powers include the authorization of rulemaking by the judicial branch, the governance and discipline of the bar by state courts of last resort, and the sanctioning of attorneys by trial lawyers in the course of managing caseflow. While inherent powers can be constrained by constitutional provisions, state and federal judges likewise have enjoyed greater receptivity from the legal profession to assertions of court authority in caseflow management than have their counterparts in other common law nations."There can be no doubt that a court which is endowed with a particular jurisdiction has powers which are necessary to enable it to act effectively within such jurisdiction. I would regard them as powers which are inherent in its jurisdiction. A court must enjoy such powers in order to enforce its rules of practice and to suppress any abuses of its process and to defeat any attempted thwarting of its process."
I AM CALLING ON THE HIGH POWERS OF ALL AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES that I pursue complete finality of my case with conviction that our Fed Judges are Highly Competent as I stated before under special Oath, and my case was never and is not against the United States Government. However our Fed Judges were caught in the net of "UNFORTUNATE CONFUSION" and misled by a misled county misled by a BAD TIP FROM A SELF-PROCLAIMED FUGITIVE as he stated to me his former employer. I further state that never had it entered my mind to make the Federal Government responsible for what has happened in the South, despite the misconception of some and the pursuit of others to disparage my character and metamorphose me into the one I am not, as though I was of the caliber of the FUGITIVE, as a black man. THAT reminds me of the l=while lady who drowned her children and when questioned, blamed it on a black man that was not even near. My intention in pursuing the United Nations was due to the fact that I am a former Foreign National as a former International Student and as such, promises were made to me both in the UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTIONS AT VIENNA AND GENEVA AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AT HOME as an international student back in 1978 and 1979. I intend for Everybody to be clear about this case FOR NEARLY the past two YEARS I HAVE BEEN EXPECTING AN HONEST PERSON TO STEP UP AND SAY "THE BUCK STOPS HERE, BUT IT WAS NOT FOUND." NOW I LOUDLY CALLED ALL RESPONSIBLE CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS TO VEHEMENTLY LOOK AT THIS CASE AND CONTACT ME FOR RESOLUTIONS. So, Please Dear authorities, CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS, and citizens of America, the time is now to cease walking like little children and to step up like grown men like the great Apostle says When I was a child I spake like a child . . ." but the time is now to refute small things and pursue the vitality of the case by taking complete responsibilities like Republicans do sometimes. We must wake up and say "Enough is enough" and no more of that FUGITIVE leading the way, no more of Walton County unchecked by superiors in high places in Florida continuing a pretext with their deceiving attorney Mr. Harry Chiles, trained to hurt and to harm procedurally coupled with a totally uninsured attorney Ken Goldberg, allowed to practice by the LAW BAR IN FLORIDA with an irresponsible license masquerading and believed by all so called respectable people. I hope no one is insulted by what I say here for e have not scratched the tip of the iceberg yet. For, what I say here is not against our darling Judicial system which I must continue to work with both as a moral citizen of the U.S. and a future LAW STUDENT AND LAWYER. I do not intend to see my Federal Government disparaged by Naysayers and I intend here to set the record straight and I decry any such attempt. Needless to reiterate that I MUST GO TO LAW SCHOOL to assist my Country in fixing the mess I see. My God, after unraveling mysteries and the truth although curled under the rubles of burdens of proof, will not forever be sequestered. At the end of the day, (I PREDICT WITH DIVINE AUTHORITY), the truth will no longer reside on the scaffold but its new address will be "on the throne." "This I believe and teach" and I have been doing it for nearly 35 years in America based on the FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. As we refute the bad tip from a FUGITIVE whom I never intend to see for the rest of my life in court, and from whom I demand an injunction of more than 500 feet anywhere. I am in severe shock after 11 hospitalizations and a clear intent to kill me for telling the truth on American Soil, where I saw my blood pressure rising to a deadly level of about 219/109 or 111, that after the severe warning by a court witness, being my former attending physician (OFFER OF PROOF SECURELY PRESENT AT THE DISTRICT COURT).
TO BE CONTINUED . . .
Mr. Roy, the developer of this blog can be reached at besttocome7@gmail.com
| 11 | $0.02575 | ||
| 8 | $0.03200 | ||
| 5 | $0.01700 | ||
| 5 | $0.02000 | ||
| 3 | $0.01050 | ||
| 3 | $0.01050 | ||
| 3 | $0.01200 | ||
| 3 | $0.01200 | ||
| 3 | $0.00656 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 2 | $0.00800 | ||
| 2 | $0.00055 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
No comments:
Post a Comment