SONY ROY, PICTURE TAKEN-2013.
I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN.
I WAS NEVER A DISSIDENT I AM NOT A DISSIDENT AND I WILL NEVER BE A DISSIDENT my ALLEGIANCE IS TO THE FLAG THAT I EMBRACED.
I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN.
I WAS NEVER A DISSIDENT I AM NOT A DISSIDENT AND I WILL NEVER BE A DISSIDENT my ALLEGIANCE IS TO THE FLAG THAT I EMBRACED.
http://ddee2.blogspot.com/
with Diane Marie Hathawa in the background the shiny precedent this iconic woman left her footprints in the judicial sand for many people like myself to followshe decared frauds at the start and steeped down that waa woman she did not wait for the mucj and mire but she rushed to do it.
Rule 59. New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment
(a) In General.
(1) Grounds for New Trial. The court may, on motion, grant a new trial on all or some of the issues—and to any party—as follows:
(A) after a jury trial, for any reason for which a new trial has heretofore been granted in an action at law in federal court; or no involuntary waivers please
(B) after a nonjury trial, for any reason for which a rehearing has heretofore been granted in a suit in equity in federal court. involuntary waivers are no longer acceptable
(2) Further Action After a Nonjury Trial. After a nonjury trial, the court may, on motion for a new trial, open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new ones, and direct the entry of a new judgment.. whatever there must not be involuntary waivers and the interstate commerce rights must be reinstated as they were before and RULE 56 must rule the day to hinder any judicial residue that would go to summary judgment as contested and disputed material facts. this is a challenge for any judicial officer.
after ten years someone was after my launch not my lunch bag costing sometimes$7.00 but my dream launch beware of such ladies and gentlemen somebody is lurking in the shadow waiting for your launch in life to stop your work I call on the U.S. Congress to stop such people with the DREAM ACT PASSED FLAMBOYANTLY.
a salient comment here , these motions referred to in this RULE 59 have been submitted especially in 2015 to no avail I can 't tell what went on in the minds of these judges I presented myself will all the wisdom and the humility necessary with respect and granting these motions will be made available to the Public at large so all can see I lauded the dignity of the court and no rule 59 was ever extended to me. all motions have been submitted and scorned and thank God the case will be the judges are taking excuses but they know for the records are in their hands except they destroyed my affidavit of ownership I urge the ouvbkic thst would obtain a coy of that posrtt upon release t[not to contact me what I lace on the post is all I can say to non-material witnesses and immarterial facts responding tosenseless questions already debated in court plese cease and desist fromcontct me it takesaway what I am trying tobaccoinplish I do not hve the time. my title insurance in three pages made straight by the great body outside the United States where people like myself owners of property by proof can talk and have a voice and where the law is one and for all and people can have a voice with the law wher rule 60-b maens rule 60-b rule 56 mean rule 56 and the high court does italso but wth a olethora of misinfornmation they are fed with I am under grear apprehensions thsythey cn see this of eht it is, the worst in the histirty I wish I were alreay a judge I would have more clout. not out side of the the undergrounds has this I-here but the whole world is not in your undergrounds and therefore the people that are lkaughing bnoow are laughing inn the underwold of lawlessness but ine day they will see ago in slplendior not giving me seven virgins and mandions but retributing the harms dine ti shildren if I at my lkevel could have suffered such what happened to my ancesteotrs who knew not even I perv]=cent of what I know if I could finf fifteen millions here perhaps If they were to be exumed I would find more than billions for them this is high ly serious and I take it as such.
THAT WAS NOT DONE AT ALL. Sony Roy 11/21/15
another major violation of law not fist:
Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order
(a) Corrections Based on Clerical Mistakes; Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate court's leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(4) the judgment is void;
(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.
To dispel the myth and the lies that are circulating, I take this special oath lest any body believes a lie, whatever source it came from. I LOVE MY COUNTRY AND I AM BOUND TO PROTECT IT, PROMOTE IT, TO ENSURE THAT PEACE IS MAINTAINED WITHIN WHERE I AM. THIS IS A SPECIAL OATH TAKEN ON DECEMBER 2014.
. NOT EVOKED AT ALL IN ALL RECORDS THAT IU HAVE MISSING DOCUMENTS OF FAILURE TO ISSUE
| 11 | $0.02575 | ||
| 8 | $0.03200 | ||
| 5 | $0.01700 | ||
| 5 | $0.02000 | ||
| 3 | $0.01050 | ||
| 3 | $0.01050 | ||
| 3 | $0.01200 | ||
| 3 | $0.01200 | ||
| 3 | $0.00656 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 2 | $0.00800 | ||
| 2 | $0.00055 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 2 | $0.00650 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
| 1 | $0.00400 | ||
a) FORCED TO BLEND TWO WORLD A FATAL BLOW TO ANY PLAINTIFF A MAJOR INJURY THAT WILL SEE HISA HEREDITY IN TIME NEVER HAOOERNED LIKE THIS BEFORE
b) another salient and imperceptible TORT is the QUADRUPLE JEOPARDY in AMERICA NEVER BEFORE DONE IN THE WHOLE WORLD.
TALK IS CHEAP> ANOTHER APPARENTLY IMPOSSIBLE INJURY WHEN A PLAINTIFF IN A CRIMINAL POLITICAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS MATTER where over 15 millions TORTS were Found so far the plaintiff IS ACCUSED FOR THE SAME SENSELESS THING FOUR TIMES shamelessly AND NO ONE SEEMS TO PAY ATTENTION. I CALL ON THE POWERS THAT BE TO STOP AMERICA PLEASE STOP THE WOLD I WANT TO GET OFF FOUR TIMES THIS THE FIRST TIME IN THE HISTORY ON MAY 11, 2005=, May12, JU15 295 and January 11, 2006 same accusation and nobody cares somebody does. the plaintiff the only person who lost more than 15 million dollars cares a lot. so much that he want s the world to know the right way.
c) ANOTHER SALIENT MATTER THAT IS MATERIAL AND VERY ESSENTIAL IN THIS CASE IS THE FIRST DEGREE ATTEMPTED MURDER WITH DEPRAVED HEART NO SENSIBILITY AT ALL. I EXPECTED TO BE BETTER TREATED THAN THAT> JUSTICES DO NOT BACK UP SENSELESS NEGLECT AND CARELESSSNESS ON THE BENCH THAT IS THE LESSON I LEARNED SINCE I WAS EIGHT YEARS OLD AND AMERICA WAS MY CHOICE TO STUDY I WAS NOT FORCED TO VCOME HERE I CAME OUT OF MY OWN WILL THERE WAS NO INVOLUNTARY ORDER FOR ME TOI COME TO AMERICA WHEN I DID MY CITIZENSHIP THERE WAS NO INVOLUNTARY ORDER FOR ME TO DO SUCH. WHERE OIS THE KINDNESS TO ANOTHER EWOMAN MY BEAUTIFUL WIFE NO BODEY CARED FOR HSHE FELT TOTATLY ABANDONED AND NEGLECTED BY PEOPLE IN POWER SHE CALED IT WQUIT IN OUR RELATIONSHIP THINKING BACK I HAVE MABNY THINGS I CAN SAY BUT SHE ACTED LIKE ANYTHER WOMAN UNDER SEVERE PRESSURE ESPECIALLY FROM MY ATTORNEY EHO SID THE DAMNING WORDS OF DISCOURAGEMENT TOHER IN HIS CONFLICT OF INTERST WITH THE JUDGE. YES, I SUFFERED THE MOST IGNOMINOUS AND INDECENT TORTURES THE WORLD EVER KNEW I FIND MYSELF AT THE MERCY OF OTHERS THST IS A SERIOUS INJURY AND NOT TOLERABLE IN THE UNITED STATES.> TO ANOTHER WOMAN IN THE CASE THAT IS NOT CALLED FOR I WANT THE JUSTICES TO GIVE A REASON TO CONTINUE MY CONFIDENCE IN THIS OR TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO ENSURE THAT SUCH DOES NOT HAPPEN IN THE FIURURE ESPECIALLY WHEN I BEGIN MY PRSACTIC WITHOUT THE FBI< THE DA OFFICE THE DOHJ< THE FCC< THE HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS I CHECKED MY RECORD AND FINF D OUT THAT NO ONE HAS EVER CONTACTED HIM AS I REQUESTED. THEOBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WAS SO PALPABLE THAT NO SERIOUS INVESTIFGSTIVE BODIES ARE AWARE OF MY CASE FOR IT NEVER ENTERED IN THEIR ENTRAILS THAT A BKLACK MAN COULD HAEVE SO MUCH MONEY BE SO BLESSED IN AMERICA SO NO ONE CARED TILL TOIDAY THEAT WAS MY MONETY THAT WAS MY PROPERTY THESE WERE MYRIGHTS THAT WAS MY BEAUTUIFUL E+WIFE YES IT WAS ME A BKLACK MAN THAT OWNED MORE THAN SEVENTEEN MILLION EITH OPROOF NOT A BUNCH OF TALK I WAS NOT HIRE BY ANY BODY AS NY FATHER TRAUINED NEVER TO APOPLUY FOR AJOD +B THAT WAS HIS ADVICE TO ME FOE I WAS NOT MADE FOR THAT LISTEN IT IUS ONLY NOW THAT OEOPLE BEGAN TO REALIKZE WHO I WAS LIKE JESIS CHRIST HE CAME ON A MISSION AND WITH HIS ONBJECTIVES CLEAR. MY FATHER HAD A KEEN EYES FOR DREAMS AND WOULD HEBE ALIVE TODAY HE WOULD BE OROUD OIF HIS SON NOT GIVING UOP NOT CAVING IN UNDER ORESSURE DESPITE THE MANDICANCIES OIF LIFE HE USED TO TELL MYE ALWAYS " YOU AILL BE A MAN MY SON" I CAN ALMOST HEAR HIM NOW TALKING BACK TO ME AND ALL MY HEROES THAT STOIOD UP AGAINST THE OPPRESSIONS OF AUTHOROITIES NAMAYL TOUSSAINT L"OUVERTURE THE FIRST BLKACK MAN EWHO DIED FOR HIS POOR COUNTRY IN FRANCE BY THE HANDS OF THE CURCSED NAPOOLOEON BONAPARTE HE BEGGED FOR HIS LIFE AND NAPOLEON TOLD HINM THAT WAS DEVISE TO SEPARATE YOU FROM YOUR WIFRE TOUSSAINT FREPLIED AND I LEARNED AOOLL THIS NOT KNOWING IF ONE DAY I WOULD BE PLAYING IN A MOVIE WITHOUT A SCRIPT.
Rule 59. New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment
(a) In General.
(1) Grounds for New Trial. The court may, on motion, grant a new trial on all or some of the issues—and to any party—as follows:
(A) after a jury trial, for any reason for which a new trial has heretofore been granted in an action at law in federal court; or no involuntary waivers please
(B) after a nonjury trial, for any reason for which a rehearing has heretofore been granted in a suit in equity in federal court. involuntary waivers are no longer acceptable
(2) Further Action After a Nonjury Trial. After a nonjury trial, the court may, on motion for a new trial, open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new ones, and direct the entry of a new judgment.. whatever there moiust not be involuntary waivers and the interstate commerce rights must be reinstated as they were before and RULE 56 must rule the day to hinder any judicial residue that would go to summary judgment as contested and disputed material facts. this is a challenge for any judicial officer.
THAT WAS NOT DONE AT ALL. Sony Roy 11/21/15
another major violation of law not fist:
